• 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引(EI)收录期刊
CHEN Yuan-fang. Comparison of the Traditonal Methods with the Flood Simulation Method to Calculate Design Flood Control Storage[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2000, 11(1): 64-69.
Citation: CHEN Yuan-fang. Comparison of the Traditonal Methods with the Flood Simulation Method to Calculate Design Flood Control Storage[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2000, 11(1): 64-69.

Comparison of the Traditonal Methods with the Flood Simulation Method to Calculate Design Flood Control Storage

Funds: The Project is Supported by National Natural Science Fund of China(No.4860007).
More Information
  • Received Date: January 06, 1999
  • Revised Date: April 29, 1999
  • Assuming that the population model of flood stochastic process is known, the precison of design flood-control storage calculated by the traditional and the flood simulative method is preliminarily compared. The criterion of the precison evaluation is unbiasness and efficiency of design flood-control storge. In the traditional methods, two design flood hydrgraph enlarging methods are considered, one is same-frequency method, the other is same-multiple method. The Monte-Carlo results shows that the precision of design flood-control storage calculted by the flood simulation method is better than the traditional methods and the same-frequency method is better than the same-multiple method if the form of flood simulation model is correct.
  • [1]
    陈元芳.随机模型参数估计及洪水随机模拟的研究[D].南京:河海大学,1992.
    [2]
    程文辉.利用随机生成不能减小设计水利参数的抽样误差[J].河海大学学报,1984,(1):27~34.
    [3]
    水利电力部.水利水电工程设计洪水计算规范(SDJ-79)[S].北京:水利电力出版社,1983.
    [4]
    陈元芳,侯玉.P-Ⅲ型参数估计方法的研究[J].河海大学学报,1992,(3):24~31.
  • Related Articles

    [1]WANG Yintang, LI Lingjie, HU Qingfang, LIU Yong, CUI Tingting, WANG Leizhi. Nonstationary hydrologic frequency analysis method considering local trends[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2017, 28(3): 406-414. DOI: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2017.03.011
    [2]YIN Shubai, SHEN Fang, FU Bolin. Study on the theory and method for determining wetland “water stage-duration-frequency” thresholds[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2016, 27(3): 476-484. DOI: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2016.03.016
    [3]ZHANG Chao, HU Zhigen. Water containment risk estimation during interim flooding for high rock-fill dams[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2014, 25(6): 873-879.
    [4]ZHANG Chao, HU Zhi-gen, LIU Quan. Integrated risk analysis for the cascade of system diversion[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2012, 23(3): 396-402. DOI: CNKI: 32.1309.P.20120501.1617.008
    [5]FAN Xi-e, HU Zhi-gen, JIN Peng. Integrated risk of construction diversion system based on the Monte-Carlo method[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2007, 18(4): 604-608.
    [6]DAI Chang-jun, LIANG Zhong-min, LUAN Cheng-mei, YE Ya-qi. Advance in flood frequency analysis for partial duration series[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2006, 17(1): 136-140.
    [7]JI Qing-feng, ZHENG Bang-min. Applications of the Monte Carlo method to potential flow[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2004, 15(4): 415-419.
    [8]TONG Hai-tao, SONG Han-zhou. Stochastic hydrogeochemical modeling of water-rock interaction system[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2004, 15(2): 211-215.
    [9]HU Zhi-gen, LIU Quan, HE Chang-hai, XIAO Huan-xiong, ZHOU Yi-hong, FU Zheng, LI Ding-kui, ZHENG Jia-xiang. Risk analysis of retaining rockfill cofferdam for diversion based on the Monte-Carlo method[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2002, 13(5): 634-638.
    [10]Liang Zhongmin, Xu Daming. Robust Estimation In Flood Frequency Analysis[J]. Advances in Water Science, 1997, 8(2): 154-160.

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (102) PDF downloads (411) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return