劳聪聪, 曾剑, 夏军强, 辛沛. 径流与涌潮对钱塘江尖山潮滩演变的影响分析[J]. 水科学进展, 2024, 35(3): 463-474. DOI: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2024.03.010
引用本文: 劳聪聪, 曾剑, 夏军强, 辛沛. 径流与涌潮对钱塘江尖山潮滩演变的影响分析[J]. 水科学进展, 2024, 35(3): 463-474. DOI: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2024.03.010
LAO Congcong, ZENG Jian, XIA Junqiang, XIN Pei. Evolution of tidal flats influenced by tidal bores and runoff in the Qiantang Estuary, China[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2024, 35(3): 463-474. DOI: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2024.03.010
Citation: LAO Congcong, ZENG Jian, XIA Junqiang, XIN Pei. Evolution of tidal flats influenced by tidal bores and runoff in the Qiantang Estuary, China[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2024, 35(3): 463-474. DOI: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2024.03.010

径流与涌潮对钱塘江尖山潮滩演变的影响分析

Evolution of tidal flats influenced by tidal bores and runoff in the Qiantang Estuary, China

  • 摘要: 潮滩湿地具有生态系统服务、海岸防护等重要功能, 认识其在涌潮与径流作用下的潮滩演变特征, 对保护钱塘江涌潮区域湿地至关重要。基于钱塘江尖山潮滩151张地形及径流、水位、泥沙和遥感数据, 探究潮滩演变特征与驱动机制。结果表明: ① 尖山潮滩呈动态平衡, 在观测区, 枯季淤积速率为0.01 m/d, 坡度降至1‰后稳定; 洪季崩岸速率达3 m/d, 崩退宽度达113 m, 但洪季后以0.05 m/d的速率恢复。② 洪季潮滩处的涌潮略强于枯季, 洪水促进河势分汊, 而涌潮主要通过南汊输沙, 减少了北汊潮滩处泥沙输送。③ 钱塘江流量是控制潮滩年内季节性冲淤变化的关键因素, 潮滩变化速率与流量、初始高程及潮差呈多元线性关系。④ 洪水改变河势, 潮滩泥沙供应减少, 含径流的退潮流冲刷增强使其崩岸退缩, 但当水流冲刷减小、涌潮与涨潮流输沙占优时, 潮滩迅速淤积。

     

    Abstract: Tidal flats provide crucial ecosystem services and coastal protection. Comprehending the evolution of tidal flats, influenced by tidal bores and runoff, is key to protecting these environments in the Qiantang Estuary′s tidal bore zones. Based on 151 observations of the Jianshan mudflat terrain, taken approximately every two days, the research explored the mudflat′s evolution. Utilizing water level, suspended sediment concentration, river discharge, and remote sensing data, the study further investigated the driving mechanisms behind this evolution. The results are as follows : ① The Jianshan mudflat maintained a dynamic equilibrium. In the observation area, the dry-season deposition rate was 0.01 m/d, with the slope stabilizing at 1‰. During the flood season, the mudflat bank retreat rate reached 3 m/d, causing a retreat width of 113 m. After the flood season, the mudflat recovered at a rate of 0.05 m/d. ② During the flood season, the intensity of tidal bores slightly increased. Flood events lead to a bifurcated river regime, directing the main sediment transport of tidal bores through the southern channel, thereby reducing sediment delivery to the tidal flats in the northern channel. ③ Qiantang River runoff was the key factor controlling seasonal erosion and deposition changes. The evolution rate of the tidal flats showed a multivariate linear relationship with river runoff, initial elevation, and tidal range. ④ Floods altered the river regime, reducing sediment supply to the tidal flats. Runoff and ebbing tides combined to cause bank erosion and retreat. However, when water erosion decreased and sediment transport by tidal bores and rising tides became dominant, the tidal flat rapidly recovered.

     

/

返回文章
返回