海域岛隧结合区水流结构和沉管沉放过程水流力试验研究

高祥宇; 高正荣; 卢中一

doi:10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2019.06.009

高级搜索

全国中文核心期刊
中国科技核心期刊
美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

海域岛隧结合区水流结构和沉管沉放过程水流力试验研究

高祥宇, 高正荣, 卢中一

文章导航 > 水科学进展 > 2019 > 30(6): 854-862

高祥宇, 高正荣, 卢中一. 海域岛隧结合区水流结构和沉管沉放过程水流力试验研究[J]. 水科学进展, 2019, 30(6): 854-862. doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2019.06.009

引用本文:

高祥宇, 高正荣, 卢中一. 海域岛隧结合区水流结构和沉管沉放过程水流力试验研究[J]. 水科学进展, 2019, 30(6): 854-862. doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2019.06.009

GAO Xiangyu, GAO Zhengrong, LU Zhongyi. Experimental study on flow structure of island-tunnel bonding zone and flow force during sinking the immersed tube[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2019, 30(6): 854-862. doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2019.06.009

Citation:

GAO Xiangyu, GAO Zhengrong, LU Zhongyi. Experimental study on flow structure of island-tunnel bonding zone and flow force during sinking the immersed tube[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2019, 30(6): 854-862. doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2019.06.009

海域岛隧结合区水流结构和沉管沉放过程水流力试验研究

doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2019.06.009

高祥宇^1,2,
高正荣^1,2,
卢中一^1,2

1.
南京水利科学研究院港口航道泥沙工程交通行业重点实验室, 江苏南京 210024;
2.
南京水利科学研究院水文水资源与水利工程科学国家重点实验室, 江苏南京 210029

基金项目: 国家重点研发计划资助项目（2017YFC1404204）；国家自然科学基金资助项目（51520105014）

详细信息

作者简介:
高祥宇(1975-),男,山西临县人,高级工程师,博士,主要从事水动力和泥沙输运模拟方面研究。E-mail:xygao@nhri.cn

中图分类号: TV122

Experimental study on flow structure of island-tunnel bonding zone and flow force during sinking the immersed tube

1.
Key Laboratory of Port, Waterway and Sedimentation Engineering of the Ministry of Transport, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210024, China;
2.
State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210029, China

Funds: The study is financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No.2017YFC1404204) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51520105014).

摘要: 港珠澳跨海通道由东、西人工岛实现桥隧过渡，海中隧道采用沉管法，沉管段总长5 664 m，从西人工岛开始布置E1—E33管节，标准管节长180 m，宽37.95m，高11.4 m，重约8万t。岛隧结合区受到人工岛挑流和基槽开挖水深突变的影响，水流结构复杂，沉管沉放时也会引起水流变化。沉管安全沉放和精准对接安装需掌握受到的水流力大小。利用宽水槽几何比尺为100的正态模型，开展岛隧结合区水流分布和沉管沉放过程水流力试验研究。结果表明：岛头无掩护措施时，岛壁挑流影响到E1管节中部附近，表、底层流速大于中层；E1管节沉放过程中纵向水流力最大可达4 601 kN，E2管节纵向水流力平均5 149 kN；掩护E1管节后，E1管节处流速大幅减小，E2管节中部受掩护体挑流影响最大，流速最大增加40%，中层流速大于表、底层；E2管节纵向水流力平均5 240 kN。当沉管完全入水后，基槽内流速较小，沉放过程中受到的水流力逐渐减小。岛隧结合区水流垂线分布并不是指数分布，受到岛头壁挑流的影响沿管节长度方向流速分布也不均匀，管段浮运水流力公式并不适用计算沉管沉放过程受到水流力的大小。
- 水流结构 /
- 沉管 /
- 水流力 /
- 岛隧结合区 /
- 港珠澳大桥
Abstract: East and west artificial islands are used to realize the transition from bridge to tunnel for Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Cross-sea Tunnel. Immersed tunneling method is applied in sea tunnel and the total length of the sinking section is 5 664 m. The tube sections of E1-E33 are arranged from west artificial island. The standard pipe section is 180 m long,37.95 m wide,11.4 m high and weighs about 80 000 tons. The connection area of the island and tunnel is affected by the deflecting flow and the sudden change of the water depth during the foundation trough excavation,and the flow pattern is complicated. Moreover,the flow pattern will be changed when the sinking joint is subsided. It is necessary to obtain the magnitude of water flow force to guarantee the safe sinking and accurate docking of the immersed tube. By using the undistorted model in a wide flume with the geometric scale of 1:100,the experimental study on the flow distribution and water flow force during the sinking process of the island tunnel is carried out. The results indicate that,when there is no protective measure at the head of the island,the deflecting flow would affect the middle part of tube E1 and the flow velocities on the surface and at the bottom layers are larger than that of the middle layer. When sinking tube E1,the maximum longitudinal flow force can reach 4 601 kN,and the averaged longitudinal flow force of tube E2 is 5 149 kN. After sheltering tube E1,the flow velocity at tube E1 decreases significantly. The middle part of tube E2 is mostly affected by the sheltering body,the maximum increment in the flow velocity reaches to 40%,and the flow velocity of the middle layer is larger than those on the surface and at the bottom layers. The average longitudinal flow force of tube E2 is 5 240 kN. When the sinking tube is completely immersed into the water,the flow velocity in the foundation trench is relatively small,and the water flow force during the sinking process decreases gradually. The vertical distribution of water flow in the connection area of island and tunnel is not exponential one,and the velocity distribution along the length of the pipe section is not uniform due to the influence of deflecting flow on the island head wall. The formula of floating water flow force at the pipe section is not suitable for calculating the magnitude of the water flow force during the sinking process of immersed pipe.
- flow structure /
- immersed tube /
- flow force /
- island-tunnel bonding zone /
- Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge

[1]	孙启航, 夏军强, 邓珊珊, 周美蓉, 司金华, 张幸农. 窝崩区水流结构的概化水槽试验研究 . 水科学进展, 2023, 34(1): 144-156. doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2023.01.014
[2]	廖伟, 张维乐, 王文娥, 王坤, 巩朝, 王芳芳. 臂坡对堰槽组合设施紊流结构影响试验研究 . 水科学进展, 2023, 34(3): 465-479. doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2023.03.013
[3]	李志威, 文杰, 陈帮, 鲁瀚友, 胡旭跃. 黑河下游颈口裁弯后河道三维水流结构研究 . 水科学进展, 2022, 33(2): 286-297. doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.33.1309.2022.02.012
[4]	张英豪, 赖锡军, 唐彩红. 单向明渠流与波浪作用下植被对水沙运动影响研究综述 . 水科学进展, 2021, 32(2): 309-319. doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2021.02.016
[5]	张英豪, 赖锡军, 张琳, 姚昕, 邓焕广. 风浪作用下水生植物对水流结构的影响——以太湖中两种典型沉水植物为例 . 水科学进展, 2020, 31(3): 441-449. doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2020.03.014
[6]	假冬冬, 陈长英, 张幸农, 应强. 典型窝崩三维数值模拟 . 水科学进展, 2020, 31(3): 385-393. doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2020.03.008
[7]	张建云. 港珠澳大桥通车一周年专刊序 . 水科学进展, 2019, 30(6): 769-769.
[8]	王红川, 杨氾, 潘军宁. 考虑极端天气时港珠澳大桥人工岛设计波浪要素——II.设计波要素校核方法 . 水科学进展, 2019, 30(6): 902-907. doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2019.06.014
[9]	王婷婷, 卢永昌, 彭志豪. 港珠澳大桥东西人工岛深埋式大圆筒岛壁结构稳定与变位模拟 . 水科学进展, 2019, 30(6): 834-844. doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2019.06.007
[10]	孙天霆, 王树鹏, 潘军宁, 王登婷, 刘清君. 考虑局部冲刷的跨海桥梁桩基基础波流力 . 水科学进展, 2019, 30(6): 863-871. doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2019.06.010
[11]	谢亚光, 余明辉, 胡鹏, 刘玉娇, 陈小齐. 弯道凹岸不同部位崩塌体对近岸水流结构影响的试验研究 . 水科学进展, 2019, 30(5): 727-737. doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2019.05.013
[12]	杨氾, 潘军宁, 王红川. 考虑极端天气时港珠澳大桥人工岛设计波浪要素——I.数值模拟中不利台风路径选取 . 水科学进展, 2019, 30(6): 892-901. doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2019.06.013
[13]	周益人, 潘军宁, 左其华. 港珠澳大桥人工岛越浪量试验 . 水科学进展, 2019, 30(6): 908-914. doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2019.06.015
[14]	何杰, 辛文杰. 港珠澳大桥沉管隧道基槽异常回淤分析与数值模拟 . 水科学进展, 2019, 30(6): 823-833. doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2019.06.006
[15]	陆彦, 周倪凯, 陆永军. 不同渗流强度对明渠水流结构影响的试验研究 . 水科学进展, 2018, 29(2): 230-235. doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2018.02.010
[16]	王协康, 周苏芬, 叶龙, 王海周. 长江与嘉陵江交汇区水流结构的数值模拟 . 水科学进展, 2015, 26(3): 372-377. doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2015.03.009
[17]	假冬冬, 黑鹏飞, 邵学军, 张幸农. 分层岸滩侧蚀坍塌过程及其水动力响应模拟 . 水科学进展, 2014, 25(1): 83-89.
[18]	季荣耀, 徐群, 莫思平, 辛文杰. 港珠澳大桥人工岛对水沙动力环境的影响 . 水科学进展, 2012, 23(6): 829-836. doi: CNKI: 32.1309.P.20121101.1757.008
[19]	刘诚, 沈永明. 水生植物对水沙运动影响的三维湍流模型 . 水科学进展, 2008, 19(6): 851-856.
[20]	谈广鸣, 秦文凯, 刘锐. 桥墩导流影响附近河床变形的实验研究 . 水科学进展, 1995, 6(3): 237-242.

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 136
HTML全文浏览量: 29
PDF下载量: 32
被引次数: 0

海域岛隧结合区水流结构和沉管沉放过程水流力试验研究

doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2019.06.009

1. 南京水利科学研究院港口航道泥沙工程交通行业重点实验室, 江苏南京 210024;

2. 南京水利科学研究院水文水资源与水利工程科学国家重点实验室, 江苏南京 210029

基金项目: 国家重点研发计划资助项目（2017YFC1404204）；国家自然科学基金资助项目（51520105014）

作者简介:
高祥宇(1975-),男,山西临县人,高级工程师,博士,主要从事水动力和泥沙输运模拟方面研究。E-mail:xygao@nhri.cn

收稿日期: 2019-01-10
刊出日期: 2019-12-25

中图分类号: TV122

关键词:

水流结构 /

沉管 /

水流力 /

岛隧结合区 /

港珠澳大桥

摘要: 港珠澳跨海通道由东、西人工岛实现桥隧过渡，海中隧道采用沉管法，沉管段总长5 664 m，从西人工岛开始布置E1—E33管节，标准管节长180 m，宽37.95m，高11.4 m，重约8万t。岛隧结合区受到人工岛挑流和基槽开挖水深突变的影响，水流结构复杂，沉管沉放时也会引起水流变化。沉管安全沉放和精准对接安装需掌握受到的水流力大小。利用宽水槽几何比尺为100的正态模型，开展岛隧结合区水流分布和沉管沉放过程水流力试验研究。结果表明：岛头无掩护措施时，岛壁挑流影响到E1管节中部附近，表、底层流速大于中层；E1管节沉放过程中纵向水流力最大可达4 601 kN，E2管节纵向水流力平均5 149 kN；掩护E1管节后，E1管节处流速大幅减小，E2管节中部受掩护体挑流影响最大，流速最大增加40%，中层流速大于表、底层；E2管节纵向水流力平均5 240 kN。当沉管完全入水后，基槽内流速较小，沉放过程中受到的水流力逐渐减小。岛隧结合区水流垂线分布并不是指数分布，受到岛头壁挑流的影响沿管节长度方向流速分布也不均匀，管段浮运水流力公式并不适用计算沉管沉放过程受到水流力的大小。

English Abstract

Experimental study on flow structure of island-tunnel bonding zone and flow force during sinking the immersed tube

1. Key Laboratory of Port, Waterway and Sedimentation Engineering of the Ministry of Transport, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210024, China;

2. State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210029, China

Funds: The study is financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No.2017YFC1404204) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51520105014).

Received Date: 2019-01-10
Publish Date: 2019-12-25

Keywords:

Abstract: East and west artificial islands are used to realize the transition from bridge to tunnel for Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Cross-sea Tunnel. Immersed tunneling method is applied in sea tunnel and the total length of the sinking section is 5 664 m. The tube sections of E1-E33 are arranged from west artificial island. The standard pipe section is 180 m long,37.95 m wide,11.4 m high and weighs about 80 000 tons. The connection area of the island and tunnel is affected by the deflecting flow and the sudden change of the water depth during the foundation trough excavation,and the flow pattern is complicated. Moreover,the flow pattern will be changed when the sinking joint is subsided. It is necessary to obtain the magnitude of water flow force to guarantee the safe sinking and accurate docking of the immersed tube. By using the undistorted model in a wide flume with the geometric scale of 1:100,the experimental study on the flow distribution and water flow force during the sinking process of the island tunnel is carried out. The results indicate that,when there is no protective measure at the head of the island,the deflecting flow would affect the middle part of tube E1 and the flow velocities on the surface and at the bottom layers are larger than that of the middle layer. When sinking tube E1,the maximum longitudinal flow force can reach 4 601 kN,and the averaged longitudinal flow force of tube E2 is 5 149 kN. After sheltering tube E1,the flow velocity at tube E1 decreases significantly. The middle part of tube E2 is mostly affected by the sheltering body,the maximum increment in the flow velocity reaches to 40%,and the flow velocity of the middle layer is larger than those on the surface and at the bottom layers. The average longitudinal flow force of tube E2 is 5 240 kN. When the sinking tube is completely immersed into the water,the flow velocity in the foundation trench is relatively small,and the water flow force during the sinking process decreases gradually. The vertical distribution of water flow in the connection area of island and tunnel is not exponential one,and the velocity distribution along the length of the pipe section is not uniform due to the influence of deflecting flow on the island head wall. The formula of floating water flow force at the pipe section is not suitable for calculating the magnitude of the water flow force during the sinking process of immersed pipe.

高祥宇, 高正荣, 卢中一. 海域岛隧结合区水流结构和沉管沉放过程水流力试验研究[J]. 水科学进展, 2019, 30(6): 854-862. doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2019.06.009

引用本文:

高祥宇, 高正荣, 卢中一. 海域岛隧结合区水流结构和沉管沉放过程水流力试验研究[J]. 水科学进展, 2019, 30(6): 854-862. doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2019.06.009

Citation:

全文HTML

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

返回文章

用微信扫码二维码

分享至好友和朋友圈

留言板

海域岛隧结合区水流结构和沉管沉放过程水流力试验研究

doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2019.06.009

作者简介: 高祥宇(1975-),男,山西临县人,高级工程师,博士,主要从事水动力和泥沙输运模拟方面研究。E-mail:xygao@nhri.cn

Experimental study on flow structure of island-tunnel bonding zone and flow force during sinking the immersed tube

计量

出版历程

海域岛隧结合区水流结构和沉管沉放过程水流力试验研究

doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2019.06.009

1. 南京水利科学研究院港口航道泥沙工程交通行业重点实验室, 江苏南京 210024; 2. 南京水利科学研究院水文水资源与水利工程科学国家重点实验室, 江苏南京 210029

作者简介: 高祥宇(1975-),男,山西临县人,高级工程师,博士,主要从事水动力和泥沙输运模拟方面研究。E-mail:xygao@nhri.cn

English Abstract

Experimental study on flow structure of island-tunnel bonding zone and flow force during sinking the immersed tube

1. Key Laboratory of Port, Waterway and Sedimentation Engineering of the Ministry of Transport, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210024, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210029, China

全文HTML

目录

作者简介:
高祥宇(1975-),男,山西临县人,高级工程师,博士,主要从事水动力和泥沙输运模拟方面研究。E-mail:xygao@nhri.cn

1. 南京水利科学研究院港口航道泥沙工程交通行业重点实验室, 江苏南京 210024;

2. 南京水利科学研究院水文水资源与水利工程科学国家重点实验室, 江苏南京 210029

作者简介:
高祥宇(1975-),男,山西临县人,高级工程师,博士,主要从事水动力和泥沙输运模拟方面研究。E-mail:xygao@nhri.cn

1. Key Laboratory of Port, Waterway and Sedimentation Engineering of the Ministry of Transport, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210024, China;

2. State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute, Nanjing 210029, China