耦合水位控制规则的水电站泄洪-发电联合分层优化调度

Hierarchical optimization scheduling for joint flood discharge and power generation of hydropower stations coupled with water level control rules

  • 摘要: 针对水电站泄洪-发电联合优化调度中考虑闸门动作使得决策变量维度激增和调度期末水位难控制的问题,本文提出机组-闸门分层优化策略,将所有闸门聚合为一个虚拟闸门,上层模型对多机组和虚拟闸门进行泄洪-发电优化调度,下层将虚拟闸门总流量在所有闸门中进行优化分配,实现问题降维;同时,提出流量分级水位控制策略,来水较大时开展泄洪-发电联合优化调度,来水较小时依据水位控制规则退水,确保调度期末水位合理消落。以峡江水库开展实例分析,实验结果表明:相比传统联合优化模型,分层模型洪峰流量从17490m3/s降至16648m3/s,削峰率从22.3%升至26.0%,发电量从558万 kWh增至567万kWh;耦合水位控制策略后,削峰率提升至26.6%,期末水位从46.00m 降至45.47m。该模型可为水电站泄洪-发电联合优化调度提供技术参考。

     

    Abstract: To address the problems associated with increases in decision variable dimensions due to the need to consider gate operations and water level control at the end of scheduling in the joint optimization scheduling of hydropower station flood discharge and power generation, this paper proposes a hierarchical optimization strategy for units and gates. All gates are aggregated into a virtual gate. The upper-level model conducts flood discharge and power generation optimization scheduling for units and the virtual gate, whereas the lower-level model distributes the total flow of the virtual gate among the actual gates to achieve problem dimensionality reduction. Moreover, a flow-classified water level control strategy is proposed: joint optimization scheduling is carried out when the inflow is high, and water is discharged according to the water level control rules when the inflow is low to ensure a reasonable drawdown of the water level at the end of scheduling. Taking the Xiajiang Reservoir as an example for analysis, the results show that compared with the traditional joint optimization model, the hierarchical model reduces the peak flow from 17,490 m3/s to 16,648 m3/s, increases the peak cutting rate from 22.3% to 26.0%, and increases the power generation from 5.58 million kWh to 5.67 million kWh. After coupling with the water level control strategy, the peak cutting rate increases to 26.6%, and the final water level at the end of scheduling decreases from 46.00 m to 45.47 m. In conclusion, the results provide a technical reference for the joint optimization scheduling of hydropower station flood discharge and power generation.

     

/

返回文章
返回