钱忠东, 黄社华. 四种湍流模型对空化流动模拟的比较[J]. 水科学进展, 2006, 17(2): 203-208.
引用本文: 钱忠东, 黄社华. 四种湍流模型对空化流动模拟的比较[J]. 水科学进展, 2006, 17(2): 203-208.
QIAN Zhong-dong, HUANG She-hua. Comparison and analysis of computed results for cavitating flow with four turbulence models[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2006, 17(2): 203-208.
Citation: QIAN Zhong-dong, HUANG She-hua. Comparison and analysis of computed results for cavitating flow with four turbulence models[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2006, 17(2): 203-208.

四种湍流模型对空化流动模拟的比较

Comparison and analysis of computed results for cavitating flow with four turbulence models

  • 摘要: 采用四种湍流模型对NACA66水翼空化流动进行模拟,分析了不同湍流模型和壁面函数对空化流动模拟结果的影响.分析结果表明:ASM模型和RNG k-ε模型对空化数不敏感,且计算精度较高;Realizable k-ε模型对空化数的变化很敏感,对不同的空化数计算精度相差很大;标准k-ε模型对空化数不敏感,但精度不高.增强壁面函数法对空化数不敏感,计算精度较高;标准壁面函数法和非平衡壁面函数法对空化数有一定的敏感性,但计算结果差异不大.

     

    Abstract: Four different turbulence models are used to simulate the cavitating flow around a hydrofoil(NACA66),and the influence of turbulence models on the computational results is analyzed.The computed and analyzed results show that:the ASM model and the RNG k-ε model are more stable than the Realizable k-ε model and accurate than the standard k-ε model with the change of cavitation number,and the enhanced wall function is more stable and more accurate than the standard wall function and the non-equilibrium wall function.

     

/

返回文章
返回