高级搜索
  • 全国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 美国工程索引（EI）收录期刊

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

河流分类体系研究综述

何萍,  史培军,  刘树坤,  高吉喜,  李向荣

downloadPDF
文章导航 > 水科学进展  > 2008 >  19(3): 434-442
何萍, 史培军, 刘树坤, 高吉喜, 李向荣. 河流分类体系研究综述[J]. 水科学进展, 2008, 19(3): 434-442.
引用本文: 何萍, 史培军, 刘树坤, 高吉喜, 李向荣. 河流分类体系研究综述[J]. 水科学进展, 2008, 19(3): 434-442.
shu
HE Ping, SHI Pei-jun, LIU Shu-kun, GAO Ji-xi, LI Xiang-rong. Classification of rivers systems[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2008, 19(3): 434-442.
Citation: HE Ping, SHI Pei-jun, LIU Shu-kun, GAO Ji-xi, LI Xiang-rong. Classification of rivers systems[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2008, 19(3): 434-442.
shu

河流分类体系研究综述

  • 1.

    北京师范大学资源学院, 北京, 100875;

  • 2.

    中国环境科学研究院生态研究所, 北京, 100012;

  • 3.

    中国水利水电科学研究院水力学研究所, 北京, 100044

基金项目: 全球环境基金海河流域水资源水环境综合管理资助项目(TF053183)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    何萍(1968- ),女,辽宁凌海人,副研究员,博士研究生,主要从事流域生态系统研究.E-mail:heping18@sohu.com

  • 中图分类号: X522;G353.11

Classification of rivers systems

  • 1.

    Institute of Resources, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;

  • 2.

    Institute of Ecology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China;

  • 3.

    Water Hydraulics Department, Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100044, China

  • 摘要: 简要阐述河流分类的目的和方法,重点对基于地貌、水文、生态、价值的分类体系进行了回顾,按照时间顺序说明了各种分类体系的发展过程。河流分类体系不断走向系统与综合,体现在从单要素到多要素、从定性到定量、从结构到过程、从单尺度线状河流到多尺度等级系统,以及从自然系统到包含社会价值。随着河流生态学实验及理论的发展、多学科的合作以及多尺度数据源条件的改善,具有预测功能的分类体系将逐步取代描述性的分类体系。国际河流分类体系的研究成果对于我国多类型河流的生态恢复与管理具有重要的借鉴意义。
    Abstract: Classification helps us create order out of chaos and be usually used as a means of ordering observation and descriptions. The river classification phase occurs during the newly early stages of development of hydroecology. The purposes and approaches of river classification are simply introduced and the mainly four types of classification schemes,i.e. morphological,hydrological,ecological and value-based schemes,are reviewed and commented. The integration and systematization are the trends of the development in the classification schemes,and the special progresses are made by linking the single factors to the multiplex ones,the qualitative analysis to quatitative ones,the structural features to processes ones,the linear rivers to the large-scale hierachical systems and the natural systems to social ones,etc. With the development of the empirically based laws and finally to the theoretical understanding,and the improvement of the multidiscipline cooperation and data availability,the descriptive classification schemes will give way to the predictive ones.The preexistent experiences from other large countries with a great diversity of aquatic ecosystem are beneficial to the nationwide forthcoming watershed restoration and management in China.
  • [1] GURNELL A M,ANGOLD,GREGORY K J.Classification of river corridors:issues to be addressed in developing an operational methodology[J].Aquatic Conservation:Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems,1994,4:219-231.
    [2] GORDON N D,MCMAHON T A,FINLAYSON B L,et al.Stream hydrology:an introduction for ecologists (2nd ed)[M].West Sussex:John Wiley & Sons Ltd.England,2004.
    [3] KONDOLF G M.Geomorphological stream channel classification in aquatic habitat restoration:uses and limitations[J].Aquatic Conservation.1995,5:127-141.
    [4] GOODWIN C N.Fluvial classification:Neanderthal necessity or needless normalcy[A].OLSEN D S,POTYONDY J P (eds.) Wildland Hydrology[C].Herndon Va:American Water Resources Association,TPS-99-3,1999.229-236.
    [5] LEOPOLD L B,WOLMAN M G.River channel patterns:braided,meandering and straight[R].Reston VA:US Geological Survey Professional Paper,1957.39-85.
    [6] ROSGEN D L.Classification of natural rivers[J].Catena,1994,22:169-199.
    [7] SMITH E,MEDIN D.Concepts and categories[M].Cambridge MA:Harvard University Press,1981.
    [8] MONTGOMERY D R,BUFFINGTON J M.Channel reach morphology in mountain drainage basins[J].Geological Society of America Bulletin,1997,109:596-611.
    [9] NANSON G,CROKE J.A genetic classification of floodplains[J].Geomorphology,1992,4:459-86.
    [10] B C Ministry of Forests.Fish-stream crossing guidebook[R].British Columbia:B C Ministry of Forests,2002.
    [11] MIALL A D.The geology of fluvial deposits:sedimentary facies,basin analysis and petroleum geology[M].Berlin:Springer-Verlag Inc,1996.
    [12] LOTSPEICH F B.Watersheds as the basic ecosystem:this conceptual framework provides a basis for a.natural classification system[J].Water Resources Bulletin,1980,16(4):581-586.
    [13] SEELBACH P W,WILEY M J.Overview of the Michigan Rivers Inventory (MRI) Project.Fisheries Technical Report No.97-3[R].Michigan:Michigan Department of Natural Resources,Ann Arbor,MI,1997.
    [14] RUST B R.A classification of alluvial channel systems[A].Miall A D(Ed).Fluvial Sedimentology[C].Calgary:Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists (Memoir 5),1978.187-198.
    [15] SCHUMM S A.The Fluvial System[M].New York:John Wiley & Sons,1977.
    [16] SCHUMM S A,HARVEY M D,WATSON C C.Incised Channels-Morphology,Dynamics and Control.Littleton[M].CO:Water Resources Publications,1984.
    [17] SIMON A A.Model of channel response in distributed alluvial channels[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,1989(14):11-26.
    [18] ROSGEN D.Applied river morphology[A].Wildland Hydrology[M].Colorado:Pagosa Springs,1996.
    [19] FRISSELL C A,LISS W J,WARREN C,et al.A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification:viewing streams in a watershed context[J].Environmental Management,1986,10 (2):199-214.
    [20] BRIERLEY G J.Channel morphology and element assemblages:a constructivist approach to facies modeling[A].In CARLING P,DAWSON M.(Eds).Advances in fluvial dynamics and stratigraphy[C].Chichester:Wiley Interscience,1996.
    [21] BRIERLEY G J.River Styles:an integrative biophysical template for river management[A].In RUTHERFURD I,BARTLEY R (Eds).Proceedings of the second stream management conference (Vol 1)[C].Melbourne:CRC for Catchment Hydrology,1999.93-100.
    [22] CHESSMAN B C,FRYIRS K A,BRIERLEY G J.Linking geomorphic character,behaviour and condition to fluvial biodiversity:Implications for river rehabilitation[J].Aquatic Conservation:Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems,2006,16:267-288.
    [23] THOMSON J R,TAYLOR M P,BRIERLEY G J.Are river styles ecologically meaningful? A test of the ecological relevance of a geomorphological river charaterization scheme[J].Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems,2004,14:25-48.
    [24] FRYIRS K A,MCNAB K.Using the river styles(r) framework as a physical template upon which an anthropophysical layer can be developed for urban streams[R].Sydney:Macquarie University,2003.
    [25] DAVENPORT A J,GURNELL A M,ARMITAGE P D.Habitat survey and classification of urban rivers[J].River Research and Applications,2004,20:687-704.
    [26] HUET M.Profiles and biology of Western European streams as related to fish management[J].Transactions of the American Fisheries Society,1959,88:153-163.
    [27] COWX I G.Factors influencing coarse fish populations in rivers:A literature review[R].Environment Agency,Rio House,Waterside Drive,Bristol BS32 4UD,UK R & D Publication,2001.
    [28] GOETHALS PAND De Pauw N.Development of a concept for integrated river ecological river assessment in Flanders,Belgium[J].Journal of Limnology,2001,60(Suppl.1):7-16.
    [29] VANNOTE R L,MINSHALL G W,CUMMINS K W,et al.The river continuum concept[J].Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences,1980,37:130-137.
    [30] OMERNIK J M.Ecoregions of the conterminous United States[J].Annals of the Association of American Geographers,1987,77(1):118-125.
    [31] WOODS A J,OMERNIK J M,BROWN D D,et al.Level Ⅲ and IV ecoregions of pennsylvania and the Blue Ridge mountains,the ridge and valley,and the central appalachians of Virginia,West Virginia,and Maryland:Corvallis,Oregon[R].N C:U S Environmental Protection Agency,National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory,EPA/600R-96/077,1996.
    [32] WELLS E,NEWALL P.An examination of an aquatic ecoregion protocol for Australia[R].Canberra:Australia and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council (ANZECC),Canberra,ACT,Australia,1997.
    [33] COWARDIN L M,CARTER V,GOLET F C,et al.Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States[M].Washington D C:US Fish and Wildlife Service Publications,FWS/OBS-79/31,1979.
    [34] LOTSPEICH F B,PLATTS W S.An integrated land-aquatic classification system[J].North American Journal of Fisheries Management,1982,2:138-l49.
    [35] LARSEN D P,OMERNIK J M,HUGHES R M,et al.The correspondence between spatial patterns in fish assemblages in Ohio streams and aquatic ecoregions[J].Environment Management,1986,10:815-828.
    [36] NAIMAN R J.Biotic stream classification[A].RJ Naiman,RE Bilby (Editors).River ecology and management:Lessons from the Pacific coastal ecoregion[C].New York:Springer-Verlag,1998.97-119.
    [37] ABELL R A,OLSON D M,DINERSTEIN E,et al.Freshwater ecoregions of North America:A conservation assessment[M].Covelo CA:Island Press,2000.
    [38] BERMAN C B.Assessment of landscape characterization and classification methods[R].Washington D C:the U S D A Forest Service,2002.
    [39] BUNN S E,ARTHINGTON A H.Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity[J].Environmental Management,2002,30:492-507.
    [40] POFF N L,ALLAN J D,BAIN M B,et al.The natural flow regime:a new paradigm for riverine conservation and restoration[J].BioScience,1997,47:769-784.
    [41] JONES H R,PETERS J C.Physical and biological typing of unpolluted rivers[R].Medmenham,United Kingdom:Medmenham Laboratory,1977.
    [42] POFF N L,WARD J V.Implications of streamflow variability and predictability for lotic community structure:a regional analysis of streamflow patterns[J].Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences,1989,46:1 805-1 818.
    [43] HARRIS N M,GURNELL A M,HANNAH D M,et al,Classification of river regimes:A context for hydroecology[J].Hydrological Processes,2000,14:2 831-2 848.
    [44] The Nature Conservancy.Indicators of hydrologic alteration Version 7 user's manual[R].Arlington V A:The Nature Conservancy,2006.
    [45] POFF N L,OLDEN J D,PEPIN D M,et al.Placing global stream flow variability in geographic and geomorphic contexts[J].River Research and Applications,2006,22(2):149-166.
    [46] O′KEEFFE J H.Review of workshop reports on the Orange River[A].CHUTTER FM,PALMER RW,WALMSLEY JJ.Orange river basin:Environmental overview[C].Pretoria,South Africa:Department of Water and Forestry,1997.
    [47] DUNN H.Identifying and protecting rivers of high ecological value[R].Canberra:Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation,2000.
    [48] National Park Service.Wild and scenic rivers guidelines[J].Federal Reister,1982,173(47):39 454-39 461.
    [49] BOON P J,DAVIES B R,PETTS G E.Global perspectives on river conservation:science,policy and practice[M].Chichester:John Wiley & Sons Ltd,2000.
    [50] COLLER K J,MCCOLL R H S.Assessing the natural value of New Zealand rivers[A].In BOON P J,CALOW P,PETTS G E (eds).River Conservation and Management[C].Chichester:John Wiley,1992.195-211.
    [51] CHESSMAN B.Assessing the conservation value and health of New South Wales rivers[R].Centre for Natural Resources,NSW Dept Land and Water Conservation.NSW Govt ISBN 0 7347 5237 7.2002.
    [52] DLWC.Stressed rivers assessment report NSW state[A].Boon P J,Howell D L (eds).Freshwater quality:summary-department of land and water conservation,Defining the indefinable?[C].Sydney:The Stationety,1998.215-234.
    [53] 黄锡荃,苏法崇,梅安新.中国的河流[M].北京:商务印书馆,1995.14-18.(HUANG Xi-quan,LI Hui-ming,JING Bo-xin.Rivers of China[M].Beijing:Higher Education Press,1985.(in Chinese))
    [54] 钱宁.关于河流分类及成因问题的讨论[J].地理学报,1985,40(1):1-10.(QIAN Ning.On the classification and causes of formation of different channel patterns[J].Acta Geographica Sinica,1985,40(1):1-10.(in Chinese))
    [55] 王随继,黎劲松,尹寿鹏.网状河流的基本特征及其影响因素[J].地理科学,1999,19(5):422-427.(WANG Sui-ji,LI Jing-song,YIN Shou-peng.Basic characteristics and controlling factors of anastomosing fluvial systems[J].Scientia Geographica Sinica.1999,19(5):422-427.(in Chinese))
    [56] 夏细禾,余文畴.长江中下游分汊河段的模糊分类[J].长江科学院院报,1999(2):7-10.(XIA Xi-he,YU Wen-chou.Fuzzy classification of braided river patterns at middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River[J].Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute.1999(2):7-10.(in Chinese))
    [57] 薛重生,董玉森,李利平.长江宜昌-大通河段河道GIS在长江防洪规划中的意义[J].地质科技情报,1999,18(4):74-76.(XUE Chong-sheng,DONG Yu-sen,LI Li-ping.Using GIS in the flood-control planning of the reach Yichang-Datong in Yangtze River[J].Geologial Science and Techology Information.1999,18(4):74-76.(in Chinese))
    [58] NAIMAN R J,ROBERT E B.River ecology and management:Lessons from the Pacific coastal ecoregion[M].New York:Springer-Verlag,1998.
    [59] KEEFFE O J H,DAVIES B R,KING J M,et al.The conservation status of southern African rivers[A].HUNTLEY B J (Ed).Biotic Diversity in Southern Africa:Concepts and Conservation[C].Cape Town:Qxford University Press,1991.266-289.
    [60] COWARDIN L M.Some conceptual and semantic problems in wetland classification and inventory[J].Wildlife Society Bulletin,1982,10:57-60.
  • [1] 雷波, 刘钰, 许迪, 姜文来.  农业水资源利用效用评价研究进展 . 水科学进展, 2009, 20(5): 732-738.
    [2] 刘晓东, 姚琪, 薛红琴, 褚克坚, 胡进.  环境水力学反问题研究进展 . 水科学进展, 2009, 20(6): 885-893.
    [3] 苏春宏, 陈亚新, 徐冰.  ET0计算公式的最新进展与普适性评估 . 水科学进展, 2008, 19(1): 129-136.
    [4] 芦绮玲, 陈刚.  多孔紊动射流的数值模拟与实验研究进展 . 水科学进展, 2008, 19(1): 137-146.
    [5] 王文圣, 金菊良, 李跃清.  水文随机模拟进展 . 水科学进展, 2007, 18(5): 768-775.
    [6] 储开凤, 汪静萍.  中国水文循环与水体研究进展 . 水科学进展, 2007, 18(3): 468-474.
    [7] 李立青, 尹澄清, 何庆慈, 孔玲莉.  城市降水径流的污染来源与排放特征研究进展 . 水科学进展, 2006, 17(2): 288-294.
    [8] 司建华, 冯起, 张小由, 张艳武, 苏永红.  植物蒸散耗水量测定方法研究进展 . 水科学进展, 2005, 16(3): 450-459.
    [9] 储开凤, 汪静萍.  我国水文循环与地表水研究进展(1998-2001年) . 水科学进展, 2004, 15(3): 408-413.
    [10] 殷福才, 王在高, 梁虹.  枯水研究进展 . 水科学进展, 2004, 15(2): 249-254.
    [11] 顾世祥, 傅骅, 李靖.  灌溉实时调度研究进展 . 水科学进展, 2003, 14(5): 660-666.
    [12] 钱天伟, 李书绅, 武贵宾.  地下水多组分反应溶质迁移模型的研究进展 . 水科学进展, 2002, 13(1): 116-121.
    [13] 郑一, 王学军.  非点源污染研究的进展与展望 . 水科学进展, 2002, 13(1): 105-110.
    [14] 王西琴, 刘昌明, 杨志峰.  生态及环境需水量研究进展与前瞻 . 水科学进展, 2002, 13(4): 507-514.
    [15] 陈亚新, 徐英, 史海滨, 魏占民.  条件模拟原理和技术进展及在水资源系统中的应用 . 水科学进展, 2002, 13(2): 246-252.
    [16] 张红武.  河工动床模型相似律研究进展 . 水科学进展, 2001, 12(2): 256-263.
    [17] 汪静萍, 潘理中.  水科学研究进展 . 水科学进展, 1999, 10(1): 95-99.
    [18] 芮孝芳, 姜广斌.  洪水演算理论与计算方法的若干进展与评论 . 水科学进展, 1998, 9(4): 389-395.
    [19] 姜加虎, 王苏民.  中国湖泊分类系统研究 . 水科学进展, 1998, 9(2): 170-175.
    [20] 刘苏峡, 刘昌明.  90年代水文学研究的进展和趋势 . 水科学进展, 1997, 8(4): 365-369.
  • 加载中
WeChat 点击查看大图
计量
  • 文章访问数:  14
  • HTML全文浏览量:  6
  • PDF下载量:  1076
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2007-04-04
  • 刊出日期:  2008-05-25

河流分类体系研究综述

  • 1. 北京师范大学资源学院, 北京, 100875;
  • 2. 中国环境科学研究院生态研究所, 北京, 100012;
  • 3. 中国水利水电科学研究院水力学研究所, 北京, 100044
    • 基金项目:  全球环境基金海河流域水资源水环境综合管理资助项目(TF053183)
    作者简介:

    何萍(1968- ),女,辽宁凌海人,副研究员,博士研究生,主要从事流域生态系统研究.E-mail:heping18@sohu.com

  • 收稿日期: 2007-04-04
  • 刊出日期: 2008-05-25

  • 中图分类号: X522;G353.11

摘要: 简要阐述河流分类的目的和方法,重点对基于地貌、水文、生态、价值的分类体系进行了回顾,按照时间顺序说明了各种分类体系的发展过程。河流分类体系不断走向系统与综合,体现在从单要素到多要素、从定性到定量、从结构到过程、从单尺度线状河流到多尺度等级系统,以及从自然系统到包含社会价值。随着河流生态学实验及理论的发展、多学科的合作以及多尺度数据源条件的改善,具有预测功能的分类体系将逐步取代描述性的分类体系。国际河流分类体系的研究成果对于我国多类型河流的生态恢复与管理具有重要的借鉴意义。

English Abstract

何萍, 史培军, 刘树坤, 高吉喜, 李向荣. 河流分类体系研究综述[J]. 水科学进展, 2008, 19(3): 434-442.
引用本文: 何萍, 史培军, 刘树坤, 高吉喜, 李向荣. 河流分类体系研究综述[J]. 水科学进展, 2008, 19(3): 434-442.
shu
HE Ping, SHI Pei-jun, LIU Shu-kun, GAO Ji-xi, LI Xiang-rong. Classification of rivers systems[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2008, 19(3): 434-442.
Citation: HE Ping, SHI Pei-jun, LIU Shu-kun, GAO Ji-xi, LI Xiang-rong. Classification of rivers systems[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2008, 19(3): 434-442.
shu

    全文HTML

参考文献 (60)

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    版权所有 © 《水科学进展》杂志社

    主办：南京水利科学研究院、中国水利学会 地址：南京市虎踞关34号邮政编码：210024

    电话：025-85829770电子邮箱：skxjz@nhri.cn

    本系统由 北京仁和汇智信息技术有限公司 开发    百度统计