夏军强, 朱恒, 邓珊珊, 周美蓉. 长江石首段河岸带地下水位变化过程模拟及分析[J]. 水科学进展, 2023, 34(4): 572-584. DOI: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2023.04.010
引用本文: 夏军强, 朱恒, 邓珊珊, 周美蓉. 长江石首段河岸带地下水位变化过程模拟及分析[J]. 水科学进展, 2023, 34(4): 572-584. DOI: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2023.04.010
XIA Junqiang, ZHU Heng, DENG Shanshan, ZHOU Meirong. Simulation and study of riparian groundwater exchange processes in the Shishou reach of the Middle Yangtze River[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2023, 34(4): 572-584. DOI: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2023.04.010
Citation: XIA Junqiang, ZHU Heng, DENG Shanshan, ZHOU Meirong. Simulation and study of riparian groundwater exchange processes in the Shishou reach of the Middle Yangtze River[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2023, 34(4): 572-584. DOI: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2023.04.010

长江石首段河岸带地下水位变化过程模拟及分析

Simulation and study of riparian groundwater exchange processes in the Shishou reach of the Middle Yangtze River

  • 摘要: 冲积河流的河岸带具有调蓄水文过程、净化水环境等重要功能, 通过研究河岸带内河水对地下水的影响范围, 可为岸线规划和管理提供重要依据。本研究于2021年在长江中游石首段实施了沿垂向不同深处的河岸土体级配测量及地下水位过程监测, 同时开展了变动河道水位条件下河岸内地下水位变化过程的数值模拟。基于数值试验, 定量分析具有不同河流形态区域内地下水位对河道水位变化的响应过程, 确定研究区域内侧岸地下水位的变化范围。实测数据及计算结果表明: 河岸带地下水位受河道水位影响显著, 离岸10 m处水位变化同步性几乎一致, 20 m处峰值落后1 d; 伴随离岸距离的增加, 地下水位滞后性增加, 峰值下降, 侧向潜流交换的主要影响范围在离岸约1 400~1 600 m, 该范围外地下水位全年内变幅小于河道水位最大变幅的5%;在单位河长范围内, 2021年河道补充地下水的水量约为5 000 m3/m, 地下水排泄到河道的水量约为3 000 m3/m; 相较于顺直段, 弯道凸岸处地下水位响应更快, 峰值更高, 凹岸则相反; 在考虑降雨入渗后, 区域内径流系数约为0.80, 地下水位变幅较不考虑降雨时的差别很小, 而河道补充(排泄)地下水流量均约为4 000 m3/m。

     

    Abstract: Riparian zones in alluvial rivers have important functions such as hydrological regulation and environmental purification.This study investigated the groundwater flow processes of the Shishou reach in the Middle Yangtze River (MYR), which can provide an important basis and reference for planning and management of the riverbanks.Soil gradation measurements and groundwater level monitoring were firstly carried out in the Shishou reach in 2021.Afterwards, numerical simulations were conducted of the groundwater flow processes under the influence of the varying river stage.Based on these numerical tests, the influencing range of riparian groundwater flow was investigated, and variation characteristics of riparian groundwater level at locations with different topographic features were quantitatively analyzed.Measured data and calculation results show that riparian groundwater level was significantly affected by river stage, given that the hydrological synchronization at 10 m away from the bank marginal was almost the same, and the peak at 20 m had a delay of only one day.With the increasing distance from the bank marginal, the response of groundwater level to in-channel water level became slower, with the peak being flattened.The impact zone of groundwater flow variation could extend to about 1 400—1 600 m away from the bank marginal.The annual variation of groundwater level outside this range was less than 5% of the maximum variation of in-channel water level.The unit channel-length water volume seeping into bank was about 5 000 m3/m during the 2021 rising and flood-peak periods, and the water volume discharging from the bank was about 3 000 m3/m during the 2021 recession period.Compared with the straight reach, the response of groundwater level at the convex side to in-channel water level was faster with a higher peak value and an opposite phenomenon was observed at the concave side.As the process of rainfall infiltration was considered, the calculated runoff coefficient was about 0.80 in the study area.Compared with the case without rainfall infiltration, variation characteristics of groundwater level were almost unchanged, but the unit channel-length water volume seeping into and discharging from the river banks were both equal to about 4 000 m3/m in 2021.

     

/

返回文章
返回