王文娥, 廖伟, 陈土成, 王惠, 胡明宇, 胡笑涛. 堰槽组合设施测流机制试验研究[J]. 水科学进展, 2021, 32(6): 922-932. DOI: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2021.06.011
引用本文: 王文娥, 廖伟, 陈土成, 王惠, 胡明宇, 胡笑涛. 堰槽组合设施测流机制试验研究[J]. 水科学进展, 2021, 32(6): 922-932. DOI: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2021.06.011
WANG Wene, LIAO Wei, CHEN Tucheng, WANG Hui, HU Mingyu, HU Xiaotao. Experimental study on the flow measurement mechanism of a weir-flume combination facility[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2021, 32(6): 922-932. DOI: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2021.06.011
Citation: WANG Wene, LIAO Wei, CHEN Tucheng, WANG Hui, HU Mingyu, HU Xiaotao. Experimental study on the flow measurement mechanism of a weir-flume combination facility[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2021, 32(6): 922-932. DOI: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2021.06.011

堰槽组合设施测流机制试验研究

Experimental study on the flow measurement mechanism of a weir-flume combination facility

  • 摘要: 山区季节性溪流流量变化大,已有灌溉渠道量水设施难以在较大流量范围内均达到测流精度要求,本文以克伦普堰和排淤量水槽组合而成的堰槽组合量水设施为试验对象,通过试验探究其测流机制。根据流量在5~79 L/s范围内的概化水槽水力性能试验,分析不同流量下的水面线、弗劳德数、垂线纵向时均流速、薄水层特征长度和特征宽度的变化,建立不同流量阈值范围内的测流公式。结果表明:①随流量的增大,堰槽组合设施流动形态从槽内流变为堰流,流量阈值对应的阈值相对水深为0.885,拟合得到组合设施槽内流和堰流的测流公式,与实测流量对比,相对误差小于3%。②组合设施槽内流和堰流水力特性不同,槽内流时槽内各测点纵向时均流速、薄水层的特征长度和特征宽度以及综合流量系数均随着流量增大而增大;堰流时,排淤量水槽槽内前段各测点纵向时均流速随着流量增大而减小,后段各测点纵向时均流速随着流量增大而增大,槽内收缩扭面段中部附近断面平均流速大小一致。③堰槽组合流量系数随着流量增大而减小。④堰槽设施下游薄水层的特征长度和特征宽度随着流量增大有下降趋势,最大值均出现在流量阈值情况下。本研究有效解决了流量变幅较大的明渠测流设施匮乏问题,可为山区季节性溪流测流设施应用提供参考。

     

    Abstract: The significant variation of seasonal streamflow in mountainous regions prevents the existing irrigation channel of the water volume facilities from meeting the flow measurement accuracy requirements in an extensive flow range. In this paper, a combined water measuring facility based on crump weir and sluicing flume is proposed, and the mechanism of its flow measurement is explored in an extensive flow range. Based on the hydraulic performance test of the generalized flume in the range of 5-79 L/s, the changes of the water surface line, Froude number (Fr), vertical longitudinal average velocity, and the characteristic length and width of a thin water layer were analyzed under different flow rates. Furthermore, the flow measurement equations were formulated in different flow threshold ranges. The results show that: ① As the flow rate increases, the flow pattern of the combined facility changes from being an in-groove flow to a weir flow, and the relative water depth of the threshold value corresponding to the flow rate is 0.885. The flow measurement formulas of the in-groove flow and the weir flow are obtained through a fit. The relative error is less than 3% compared with the measured flow rate. ② The in-groove and the weir flow have different characteristics in the combined facility; when the in-groove flow occurs, the average longitudinal velocity, the characteristic length and width of the thin water layer, and the comprehensive flow coefficient of each measuring point increases with the flow rate. When the weir flow occurs, the average longitudinal velocity of each measuring point in the front of the flume decreases as the flow rate increases. In contrast, the average longitudinal velocity of each measuring point in the back increases with the flow rate. The average section velocity near the middle of the contraction torsion surface in the flume is the same. ③ The combined facility flow coefficient m0 decreases as the discharge increases. ④ The characteristic length and width of the thin water layer downstream decrease as the flow rate increases, and the maximum value is reached at the flow threshold. This study effectively solves the lack of flow measuring facilities in open channels with a significant flow fluctuation. It can provide a reference in the application of flow measuring facilities for seasonal streams in mountainous regions.

     

/

返回文章
返回